Global drug giant GSK 'published a flawed study which
led to millions of children being wrongly prescribed dangerous antidepressants'
- GlaxoSmithKline published trial in 2001 claiming Seroxat, also known as Paxil, was 'generally well tolerated' and helped cure depression in children
- Led to 2 million youngsters being prescribed the pill the next year in US
- Now new BMJ study has highlighted major flaws in the original study
- Drug 'no more effective than a placebo and risk of harm was significant'
A global drugs giant published a
flawed study which led to millions of children being prescribed potentially
dangerous pills, new research reveals.
GlaxoSmithKline misled doctors and
the public into thinking their antidepressants were safe and effective, even
though there was no evidence to back this up.
The firm published a trial back in
2001 claiming paroxetine - known as Paxil or Seroxat – was ‘generally well
tolerated’ and helped cure depression in children and adolescents.
This led to two million youngsters
being prescribed the pill the following year in the US alone, partly because
GSK was paying doctors to attend lavish events where it was promoted.
The authors of the trial claimed the
pills were ‘well tolerated’, ignoring the fact that they had been shown to
increase the risk of suicidal thoughts.
A BMJ study has highlighted serious
flaws in a trial published by GlaxoSmithKline, that found the drug paroxetin -
marketed as Seroxat and Paxil - was 'generally well tolerated by children with
depression
Now a new study in the BMJ has gone
back over this trial and highlighted major flaws, showing the extent to which
doctors and patients were misled.
Australian researchers point out
that the drug was no more effective than a dummy pill and that the increased
risk of harms was ‘clinically significant.’
They also highlight how the trial
was actually typed up by a medical writer hired by GSK while another of the senior
scientists involved was under investigation by US authorities for his ties to
drugs firms.
The editor of the BMJ Fiona Godlee
said the case ‘shows the extent to which drug regulation is failing us'.
Although this took place some time
ago, she said many drugs firms routinely overstate the benefits and underplay
the side effects in trials in their treatments.
This includes trials for statins and
she said too little had been published about the potential harms of these
cholesterol-lowering pills.
On top of this, there are also
concerns that many of the scientists involved in these medical trials are being
paid by the drugs firms to carry out other work or attend conferences and
dinners.
She said: ‘This long running saga
has within it all the seeds of our current discontent - industry malpractice,
paid opinion leaders twisting the results of trials, hidden data allowing
manufacturers, academics and clinicians to overstate the benefits and underplay
the harms of treatment.'
The BMJ study found the drug - which
was prescribed to two million children in the US off the back of the GSK study
in 2001 - was no more effective than a dummy pill and the risk of harm was
'clinically significant'
GSK was fined a record £2 billion by
a US court in 2012 wrongly promoting Paxil between 1997 and 2004 in what was
described as the biggest fraud in American healthcare history.
The offences included paying US
doctors to attend dinners, lunches, spas and pheasant hunting trips where the
treatment was heavily promoted.
The treatments are not widely
offered to children and teenagers now and there are clear safety warnings on
their packets.
A spokesman for GSK said: ‘We were
able to help this team to carry out their reanalysis by providing access to the
detailed data from the original trial.
‘This reflects our commitment to
data transparency – we publish the results of all our studies regardless of
whether they are positive or negative.
‘Importantly, the findings from this
team’s analysis appear to be in line with the long-standing view that there is
an increased risk of suicidality in paediatric and adolescent patients given
antidepressants like paroxetine.
‘This is widely known and clear
warnings have been in place on the product label for more than a decade. As
such we don’t believe this reanalysis affects patient safety.’
For confidential support call the
Samaritans in the UK on 08457 90 90 90, visit a local Samaritans branch or click here for details.
No comments:
Post a Comment