Real Acupuncture and Sham Acupuncture
Are Different, fMRI Says
Acupuncture is effective for managing pain, but its site-specificity
is always questioned. A new study was conducted to compare the cerebral
responses of needling applied to an acupuncture point to the needling of a sham
point, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Twenty-one healthy
male volunteers were enrolled in the study. Manual stimulation of the acupuncture
point Neiting (ST 44) and a sham point on the dorsum of the left foot was
applied during fMRI in a crossover manner. fMRI data analysis was performed
contrasting the Neiting (ST 44) and the sham conditions. Stimulation intensity,
subjective discrimination of the needling site and the incidence of
"Qi" sensation were additionally recorded. Stimulation of point Neiting
(ST 44), in comparison to the sham procedure, was associated with an increased
fMRI-activation in the primary somatosensory, the inferior parietal and the
prefrontal cortex and the posterior insula. Sham needling was associated with
increased activation in the anterior cingulate cortex and the anterior insula.
Verum acupuncture increased the activity of discriminative somatosensory and
cognitive pain processing areas of the brain, whereas sham needling activated
the areas responsible for affective processing of pain. This study may explain
favorable effects of verum acupuncture in clinical studies about treatment of
chronic pain patients.
Usichenko TI,
Wesolowski T,
Lotze M.
Verum and sham acupuncture
exert distinct cerebral activation in pain processing areas: a crossover fMRI
investigation in healthy volunteers. Brain Imaging Behav. 2014 Apr 12.
No comments:
Post a Comment