What Acupuncture Research
Community Has Achieved
Community Has Achieved
Clinical
research: (i) There is mounting evidence from large-scale effectiveness trials
that acupuncture treatments are superior to usual care for some chronic pain
conditions. (ii) However, overall, acupuncture treatments are, at most, only
marginally more effective than sham acupuncture. (iii) Sham acupuncture
treatment, when compared to no treatment, is associated with larger effect
sizes than when conventional placebos are compared to no treatment. (iv) There
is no conclusive evidence as to which individual components of acupuncture
treatment are directly associated with therapeutic benefit.
Basic
research: (i) Basic science experiments, mostly in animals and healthy human
subjects, show that acupuncture needling has demonstrable physiological effects
that are dependent on needling parameters, including needle insertion depth,
type, amplitude and frequency of needle stimulation. (ii) In animal models,
needling parameters appear related to therapeutically relevant outcomes, for
example, analgesia, antihyperalgesia, decreased tissue inflammation, decreased
elevated blood pressure, and altered gastrointestinal motility. (iii) The
extent to which the precise needling location (e.g., acupuncture point versus
nearby nonacupuncture point) influences physiological responses remains
unclear, although, in animal models, different effects have been demonstrated when
needles are inserted in different body regions (e.g., abdomen versus limb).
To read the research report, click here.