Nobel win prompts debate over roles of traditional
Chinese medicine, science
(Beijing) - China's Tu Youyou collects her
country's first Nobel Prize for medicine next week for extracting an
anti-malarial drug from a herb mentioned in a traditional text, but her award
has prompted debate over the role of science in the practice.
Tu derived artemisinin from sweet
wormwood, which she found cited in a 4th century traditional Chinese medicine
(TCM) document as a fever treatment, developing a crucial weapon in the global
fight against the mosquito-borne disease as resistance to other treatments
spread.
Traditional medicine is a source of
cultural pride in some Chinese quarters, with Beijing planning to expand its
provision, and even Premier Li Keqiang seized on the Nobel award, hailing Tu's
discovery as "a great contribution of TCM to the cause of human
health".
But Nobel committee member Hans
Forssberg was adamant: "It's very important that we are not giving a prize
to the traditional medicine," he said, stressing that the award was only
for scientific work that had been inspired by it.
TCM practitioners say her recognition
could encourage similar research that may sideline the underpinnings of their
theories.
TCM is based on a set of beliefs
about human biology, including the existence of a life force, "qi",
and that illness is the result of "imbalances" between the five
elements -- fire, water, earth, metal and wood -- in the system.
There is no orthodox evidence for
such concepts, and the respected scientific magazine Nature has described TCM
as "largely just pseudoscience, with no rational mechanism of action for
most of its therapies", calling them an "arcane array of potions and
herbal mixtures".
In contrast, Tu chemically extracted
the active ingredient of a single plant in isolation.
"Many fear that the recent
Nobel Prize, which celebrates westernised Chinese medicine, will end up doing
more harm than good for authentic traditional medical practice," said Lan
Jirui, who has a booming TCM private practice in Beijing.
Describing her research as a victory
for TCM was "reckless", said the state-run China Daily, arguing that
would encourage Westernised reforms that ignore traditional theories about the
body as a holistic system.
To continue to read, click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment